THE FOLLY OF REDISTRICTING AND GERRYMANDERING

Currently we have 435 members in The House Of Representatives. Each one comes from a district containing about 600,000 people. States are assigned their number of representatives based on population as reported by the 10 year census. Because states gain or lose representatives because of the gain or loss of people and because of population shifts within the state, the districts must be redrawn by the state government (usually the state legislature). Whichever party is in power will often attempt to draw the districts in such a way as to gain as many potential seats for its party as possible. This often results in districts which have very strange shapes. The current efforts to do this in Texas and Colorado by the Republican Party are not new. Democrats have done this over the years just as the Republicans. The term “Gerrymandering” comes from a political cartoon in 1812. It made fun of Massachusetts governor Elbridge Gerry who drew congressional districts that looked a little like a salamander and were dubbed “Gerrymanders” by the cartoonist.

HERE IS HOW IT WORKS

Imagine that this fictitious state is made up of neighborhoods which (like most of ours today) are loyal to certain political parties. In this case we will call the two parties Reds and Blues.

Our mythical state is equally divided between the two parties and has been assigned eight representatives. Each block on the map contains roughly the same population. You would think that it makes the most sense to keep the districts geographically organized. Each district would then be more likely to be served by the same news media and would be most likely to share many concerns. It would be logical to expect the districts to be drawn something like this

Notice that Red is likely to win 3 districts (E, F & H). Blue also is likely to win 3 (A, B & G). The remaining two districts (C & D) are evenly balanced. This is an ideal situation. In real life there will be variations but as long as the decision is based on cultural and geographic interests and not political maneuvering for unfair advantage, the nation will be served.

NOW NOTICE WHAT HAPPENS IF RED IS ALLOWED TO DRAW THE DISTRICTS:

Even though half the people in the state are supporters of the Blue Party, they will be likely to win only two of the eight seats in Congress. Red wins the rest. Here is a better view of what these districts will look like:

When Blue gets back in power you can bet the new districts will look like this:

Here is a better view of the redistricting which will result in Red receiving only two likely seats despite having half of the population. Blue is likely to win the other six seats!

The way the Congress is organized, the party in the minority has little or no say in what happens. In the case of Gerrymandered results, as many as half of the people in the country can be without a voice in lawmaking.

These examples are not that far fetched. Both parties engage in this and other unfair practices. We could dismiss it as silliness except that it results in a breakdown of our democratic tradition. The whole concept further illustrates the follies that result from having professional politicians influenced by high ticket lobbyists driving elections with their contributions.

EASY SOLUTION:

A very basic computer program will be devised to draw districts based on the following criteria arranged in descending order of importance:

Population must be within 2 % of ideal
Shape and geographic conditions of the district
The service to the area of media outlets

Nothing else will be considered.

BACK TO FIXING CONGRESS